The Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music 2008 (Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music) | 
 enlarge | Authors: Ivan March, Edward Greenfield, Robert Layton
Creator: Paul Czajkowski
Publisher: Penguin (Non-Classics)
Category: Book
List Price: $30.00
Buy New: $17.28
You Save: $12.72 (42%)
New (16) Used (15) from $11.75
Avg. Customer Rating:  16 reviews
Sales Rank: 51016
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 1568
Shipping Weight (lbs): 4.3
Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.8 x 2.5
ISBN: 0141033363
Dewey Decimal Number: 781.680266
EAN: 9780141033365
ASIN: 0141033363
Publication Date: October 10, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Absolutely Brand New & In Stock. 100% 30-Day Money Back. Direct from our warehouse. Ships by USPS. 1+ million customers served-In business since 1986. Happy Customers is Our #1 Goal. Toll Free Support
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 11 more reviews...
 6 STARS! A Bible for Classical Music July 29, 2008
I have used all the verions of this reference bible, so to speak, for 20 years. My entire (well over 300) CD Library was based on this book. Yes, they favor British and European artists, but they work extensively with the BBC and its treasure trove of 'live' recordings over the last 60 years. The bonus is, they now include DVD reviews.
 Penguin classics June 16, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Still a good guide to classic recordings and now includes DVDs, but many of the recordings cited are unobtainable. Reviews now seem to focus on musical integrity and make no mention of the sound quality of the CDs. Still, a lot better than just guessing!
 Extremely disappointing May 6, 2008
6 out of 7 found this review helpful
I agree with the negative reviews posted here. I have been buying this guide regularly for decades, and look forward to each new issue avidly, despite the ever-lengthening trail of nonsensical statements that have survived cut-and-paste editing as recordings are added or (especially) deleted from the list. I can kind of forgive this particular widespread mess, as the task of editing such a huge volume with less than an army of editorial staff is truly daunting. Despite the ever-worsening series of little faults, it has always been the Gold Standard for serious collectors of classical recordings. But the latest edition has finally toppled over into the mud. For the first time there are fewer entries rather than more compared to the last full edition, and the ax has been wielded completely to several composers. Adios, Alberto Gerhard! The Guide has always been good about covering new recordings very promptly, but this time there are many, many important new issues that have not been included. The bulk is just as great as before, but that is because the space is used up with larger typeface and the introduction of superfluous boxes around chosen recordings. The plethora of distinguishing marks given to different recordings is almost impossible to parse and borders on the comical. Three stars for a fully recommended recording, three stars with a key for "key recordings", now FOUR stars for fully fully fully fully recommended recordings, and four stars with a rosette for, well, gosh, if everything else is so fully extra-special wonderful, these must be guaranteed to change your life. The evaluation process has degenerated into a form of hype. Since almost all recordings that previously received a less-than-three-star rating have been dropped, this leaves this as pretty much a Guide to Recommended Recordings. You might think it is not much of a loss to drop listings of less-recommended recordings, but it was always possible to develop an understanding of the well-marked biases and limitations of the three editors by seeing which kinds of interpretations they tended to give lower ratings, and therefore to compensate for the basic dullness and correctness of their very British critical bias. This strategy is no longer available for readers.
So, after many, many years of excitedly snapping up each new edition, I will probably not be buying any more Penguin Guides to Classical Music. (The sad demise of one of the two editors of the Penguin Guide to Jazz probably puts an end to that wonderful publication as well.) I am seriously disappointed, and, considering the hundreds of hours I have spent with the various editions of this publication, I actually feel I have lost a small corner of my life that has given me a lot of pleasure.
It may be that the Guide is still useful to newer collectors, but it a sad comedown from its own established level.
Classic music lovers' sourcebook gets better and better May 3, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
After purchasing The Penguin Guide to Jazz Recordings: Eighth Edition (Penguin Guide to Jazz Recordings) and being very happy with it, this was an obvious choice for me to start getting a handle on my classical music collection. The book is well organized and attempts to be comprehensive, but given the expanse of classical music available, invariably some of your personal favorite recordings will be left out of this tome. (One of my all time favorites, and a recurring title of many "must have" classical music lists, Mussorgsky: Pictures at An Exhibition was left out, for example.) This volume uses a box summary with symbols and abbreviations that allow them to distinguish certain recordings from others, and it is very useful with a not-too-steep learning curve. Unlike the jazz version, this does not attempt to establish a "core collection", leaving the digging and experimenting to the reader/listener. All in all, anyone who purchases classical music on a regular basis would serve themselves well to have this book handy.
 2.5 stars- Not worth buying anymore April 20, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
I'll make this short and sweet. This guide is not worth purchasing anymore because reissues of old recordings are rarely included, plus, a good many of brand new recordings are not included. I really thought the Penguin Guide was superb in the early 90's but no more. When they include the same old recordings they just use the review that they previously did and don't have to write anything new, so they look like they're a bit lazy. If they get their act together one of these days you might want to try them again but I'm sure that will be a good long time in the future.
|
|
|
