|
MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing, 3rd ed. | 
 enlarge | Author: Modern Language Association
Publisher: Modern Language Association of America
Category: Book
List Price: $32.50
Buy New: $21.20
You Save: $11.30 (35%)
New (17) Used (7) from $17.95
Avg. Customer Rating:  4 reviews
Sales Rank: 4521
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 3
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 336
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.2
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6.3 x 1.3
ISBN: 0873522974
Dewey Decimal Number: 808.027
EAN: 9780873522977
ASIN: 0873522974
Publication Date: June 30, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Book Description
Reorganized and revised, the third edition of the MLA Style Manual offers complete, up-to-date guidance on writing scholarly texts, documenting research sources, submitting manuscripts to publishers, and dealing with legal issues surrounding publication. New in the third edition:
* a significant revision of MLA documentation style
* simplified citation formats for electronic sources
* detailed advice on the review process used by scholarly journals and presses
* a fully updated chapter on copyright, fair use, contracts, and other legal issues
* guidelines on preparing electronic files
* discussion of the electronic submission of a dissertation
* a foreword by Domna C. Stanton on the current state of scholarly publishing
* a preface by David G. Nicholls on what is new in the third edition
MLA guides present the most accurate and complete information on MLA style.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 A Shocking Debacle! August 18, 2008
NOTE: The previous three reviews, obviously, are reviews of previous editions of this manual; I address the current, third edition--and only with regard to citation format.
The changes this edition introduces, on the whole, constitute a catastrophe for the MLA. If these changes are reflected in the next edition of the _MLA Handbook_, most students, scholars, and teachers/professors in the humanities are sure to abandon the MLA. Here are just a few of the inexplicable gaffes I have noticed so far:
1. DELETION OF THE APPENDIX ON FOOTNOTES/ENDNOTES (former Appendix A). This is the whopper. Most students and scholars in the humanities use footnotes/endnotes. Without the old appendix--which should never have been a mere appendix, to begin with--the book is rendered useless to most students and scholars. Certainly, teachers and professors can no longer recommend it, or any subsequent edition of the _MLA Handbook_ based on it, to their students.
2. PLACEMENT OF SERIES INFORMATION AT END OF CITATIONS (section 6.6.15, formerly 6.6.16). This one baffles me. Who could think such placement even remotely aesthetically pleasing? On a practical level, such placement tends to burry the ever-so-important year of publication.
3. UBIQUITOUS MEDIUM OF PUBLICATION DATA. Okay, this one baffles me too. Despite feeble protestations to the contrary, "print" and "film" are default assumptions within their respective domains. Having to write those designations at the end of all relevant citations is silly, superfluous, ugly, wordy, and a waste of ink and paper. Aren't we supposed to be "green" now?
4. CITATION OF ONLINE SOURCES. Yet another baffler! Anyone who thinks getting rid of URL addresses in citations is a good idea is just plain nuts. URLs are the easiest way of locating websites. The editors' argument that reproducing URLs is a process prone to error is specious. A simple "copy and paste" operation solves the problem easily and quickly. With citations of online sources, more is better--though, obviously, with a URL, the "web" designation would be superfluous.
5. DELETION OF BRACKETED ELLIPSES (former and current section 3.9.5). Bracketed ellipses provided the simplest way of distinguishing between original and inserted ellipses. Now, one must return to the parenthetical "ellipsis in original."
6. DELETION OF METHOD OF INDICATING ITALICS/UNDERSCORING ELECTRONICALLY (former and current section 3.5). The old recommendation was ideally suited for online boards and chatrooms and for email.
7. ERROR REGARDING COMPLETE PUBLICATION DATA FOR SPECIAL ISSUES OF JOURNALS. The end of section 6.5.13 claims to provide guidance for those wishing to provide full publication data but provides no publication data. Presumably, the intent must have been along the lines of the final example of section 6.6.16.
I have found only two welcome changes in this edition: (1) the long-overdue change from underscoring to italics; and (2) the revised format for republished journal issues, section 6.6.16, though this latter matter is rather subtle. Otherwise, as far as I have been able to check thus far, the new edition's changes in citation format are a travesty. The next edition of the _MLA Handbook_ must ignore this edition, which must be discontinued at once; otherwise, the MLA will find its influence greatly diminished and its publications staff downsized. As a longtime user of MLA format (with footnotes), it saddens me that I may have no choice but to turn to and recommend the _Chicago Manual of Style_ in the future. Certainly, I will be using this edition only as a paperweight.
For citation style, I still recommend the current, sixth edition of the _MLA Handbook_ above all other guides.
 Advanced MLA Style October 28, 2003
42 out of 43 found this review helpful
Gibaldi's MLA STYLE MANUAL AND GUIDE TO SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING describes itself perfectly. This fine reference book is designed for academics in the humanities who must adhere to the MLA style when writing papers, both for publication and advanced coursework. Not an introduction to MLA style, this book aims to guide the reader through the finer intricacies of scholarly writing by covering topics such as the proper use of punctuation, including slashes, square brackets, and semi-colons; using proper names from non-English speaking countries; questions of capitalization; abbreviations; and language and style. The author devotes an entire section to the legal issues of publishing academic papers, and another to thesis and dissertation formats. Perhaps the most detailed and helpful section concerns documentation and the format for citations, from corporate papers to electronic sources to books without page numbers. For those preparing for publication, the author offers practical guidelines for formatting manuscripts. Gibaldi's explanations are always clear and precise.I highly recommend this manual for upper-level undergraduates, graduate students, and professors in the humanities. (Scientific style is somewhat different.) If you are just beginning to familiarize yourself with MLA style, you might feel more comfortable with Gibaldi's other stylebook, MLA HANDBOOK FOR WRITERS OF RESEARCH PAPERS.
the perfect reference source April 20, 2000
100 out of 101 found this review helpful
This book is the ultimate guide for writers. It is one of two books published by the Modern Language Association, and of the two, this one provides the complete guide to the MLA style. This book serves graduate students and scholarly writers best. It discusses publishing and legality as well as basics of writing and source citations. Many examples accompany the explanations clearly exhibiting the proper usage; however, this book is not necessary for the average research writer or undergraduate. If you are looking for a quick reference guide to proper MLA style, this is not the book for you. I would recommend the MLA HANDBOOK. The MLA HANDBOOK provides an easier, condensed version of the MLA STYLE MANUAL. This book is a waste of your money if all you need is information on how to do a works cited page or an annotated bibliography. The handbook is cheaper and would serve you much better. Regardless, the manual would serve anyone well and is a perfect reference book for anyone's personal library.
MLA Style Guide...a great resource in most cases March 26, 2000
31 out of 31 found this review helpful
When I picked this book up I was simply looking for ways to cite internet resources. It turns out the people at MLA have got a lot more to offer. The book did a great job at showing the hows and whys of writing well. As for citations, a critical aspect of most research, the Guide gave a multitude of different types of sources and how to cite them, not only in the Works Cited but also in endnotes and footnotes. Perhaps my only complaint would be the repetition in seperate chapters on citation. It was not initially clear what the purpose of the repetition was. That said, I will use this book again and again as a perfect tool when writing my papers.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
