|
Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything | 
 enlarge | Author: Steven D. Levitt
Creator: Stephen J. Dubner
Publisher: HarperAudio
Category: Book
List Price: $29.95
Buy New: $17.90
You Save: $12.05 (40%)
New (4) Used (11) Collectible (1) from $14.94
Avg. Customer Rating:  1559 reviews
Sales Rank: 279593
Format: Unabridged
Media: Audio CD
Edition: Unabridged
Number Of Items: 6
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 5.8 x 5.2 x 0.8
ISBN: 0060776137
Dewey Decimal Number: 330
EAN: 9780060776138
ASIN: 0060776137
Publication Date: May 1, 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: Brand New & Factory Sealed! Free USPS Delivery Confirmation!
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
Economics is not widely considered to be one of the sexier sciences. The annual Nobel Prize winner in that field never receives as much publicity as his or her compatriots in peace, literature, or physics. But if such slights are based on the notion that economics is dull, or that economists are concerned only with finance itself, Steven D. Levitt will change some minds. In Freakonomics (written with Stephen J. Dubner), Levitt argues that many apparent mysteries of everyday life don't need to be so mysterious: they could be illuminated and made even more fascinating by asking the right questions and drawing connections. For example, Levitt traces the drop in violent crime rates to a drop in violent criminals and, digging further, to the Roe v. Wade decision that preempted the existence of some people who would be born to poverty and hardship. Elsewhere, by analyzing data gathered from inner-city Chicago drug-dealing gangs, Levitt outlines a corporate structure much like McDonald's, where the top bosses make great money while scores of underlings make something below minimum wage. And in a section that may alarm or relieve worried parents, Levitt argues that parenting methods don't really matter much and that a backyard swimming pool is much more dangerous than a gun. These enlightening chapters are separated by effusive passages from Dubner's 2003 profile of Levitt in The New York Times Magazine, which led to the book being written. In a book filled with bold logic, such back-patting veers Freakonomics, however briefly, away from what Levitt actually has to say. Although maybe there's a good economic reason for that too, and we're just not getting it yet. --John Moe
Product Description
Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? What kind of impact did Roe v. Wade have on violent crime? These may not sound like typical questions for an economist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He is a much-heralded scholar who studies the riddles of everyday life -- from cheating and crime to sports and child rearing -- and whose conclusions regularly turn the conventional wisdom on its head. Thus the new field of study contained in this book: Freakonomics. Levitt and co-author Stephen J. Dubner show that economics is, at root, the study of incentives -- how people get what they want or need especially when other people want or need the same thing. In Freakonomics, they set out to explore the hidden side of ... well, everything. The inner workings of a crack gang. The truth about real-estate agents. The secrets of the Ku Klux Klan. What unites all these stories is a belief that the modern world is even more intriguing than we think. All it takes is a new way of looking. Steven Levitt, through devilishly clever and clear-eyed thinking, shows how to see through all the clutter. Read by Stephen J. Dubner
Download Description
"Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? What kind of impact did Roe v. Wade have on violent crime? These may not sound like typical questions for an economist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He is a much heralded scholar who studies the stuff and riddles of everyday life -- from cheating and crime to sports and child rearing -- and whose conclusions regularly turn the conventional wisdom on its head. He usually begins with a mountain of data and a simple, unasked question. Some of these questions concern life-and-death issues; others have an admittedly freakish quality. Thus the new field of study contained in this book: freakonomics. Through forceful storytelling and wry insight, Levitt and co-author Stephen J. Dubner show that economics is, at root, the study of incentives -- how people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing. In Freakonomics, they set out to explore the hidden side of ... well, everything. The inner workings of a crack gang. The truth about real-estate agents. The myths of campaign finance. The telltale marks of a cheating schoolteacher. The secrets of the Ku Klux Klan. What unites all these stories is a belief that the modern world, despite a surfeit of obfuscation, complication, and downright deceit, is not impenetrable, is not unknowable, and -- if the right questions are asked -- is even more intriguing than we think. All it takes is a new way of looking. Steven Levitt, through devilishly clever and clear-eyed thinking, shows how to see through all the clutter. Freakonomics establishes this unconventional premise: If morality represents how we would like the world to work, then economics represents how it actually does work. It is true that readers of this book will be armed with enough riddles and stories to last a thousand cocktail parties. But Freakonomics can provide more than that. It will literally redefine the way we view the modern world. "
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1554 more reviews...
 Computers August 25, 2008
Computers, not abortion are the reason for the drop in crime in the 90's.
Think about it.
Rogue? What rogue? August 25, 2008
Even if his research interests are cheating, corruption, and crime, Steven D. Levitt - MIT PhD, John Bates Clark Medal winner and father of four - makes a poor rogue. And it is sometimes hard to tell if he is an economist, statistician or sociologist. Other than those minor points, the title is fairly accurate.
Levitt is best known for his controversial argument that legalized abortion was largely responsible for the unexpected drop in US crime rates during the 1990s. But the book covers many other topics. Suspicious patterns of right and wrong answers on multiple choice tests are used to catch cheating (by teachers!). Consistent wins against the odds in crucial sumo bouts put the finger on colluding wrestlers. Real estate agents keep their own homes on the market longer, and sell them for higher prices, than they do with clients' homes. And a retired economist and college educated gang leader happen to keep unusually good records of their respective bagel and crack cocaine businesses.
Like Seinfeld, Freakonomics claims not to be about anything. This disclaimer, however, is somewhat undermined by the list of themes (conveniently highlighted in italics) in the introduction. Themes, moreover, stunning in their banality and vacuity. "Incentives are the cornerstone of modern life . . . The conventional wisdom is often wrong . . . Dramatic effects often have distant, even subtle, causes . . . Experts use their informational advantages to serve their own agenda . . . Knowing what to measure and how to measure it makes a complicated world much less so . . . morality represents the way we would like the world to work, and economics represents the way it does work."
The authors liked the last line so much they could not resist repeating it throughout the book, even when what they are writing shows the exact opposite. Economic incentives can backfire if they weaken social and moral incentives - imposing a small fine on tardy parents at a day-care centre or paying donors for blood. And their explantion of incentives is gruesomely bad:
"If you toddle over to the hot stove and touch it, you burn a finger. But if you bring home straight A's from school, you get a new bike. If you are spotted picking your nose in class, you get ridiculed. But if you make the basketball team, you move up the social ladder." (Followed by three more pairs of totally unrelated opposites.)
Freakonomics is full of interesting stories, even if each finding could be (and has been) questioned individually. (After all, is there anything interesting in the social sciences that has not attracted criticism?) If anecdotes are all you want, the book is great. If you want anything more . . .
Originally published in the Economic Record, March 2006.
 Freakonomics August 23, 2008
This is the most fascinating book I have read this year. I could not resist sending copies to my friends and relatives
Good with flaws August 13, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
For those that don't know, the basic idea behind this book is that it applies economics to weird questions that aren't normally thought of as economics, like:
- Are teachers cheating on standardized exams?
- Are sumo wrestlers rigging matches?
- Will real estate dealers get the best deal for clients? (Hint: they tend to get better prices when selling their own houses than when selling clients' houses).
His results are often intriguing, and this results in a very interesting and readable book. Even people who hated economics in college or swore they would never take it will enjoy this book.
However, it seems like the authors let their own political views bias their work in places. For example, one of their more controversial claims is that abortion led to decreases in crime because the people most likely to be aborted are also the people most likely to be criminals. While this may be intuitive, other economists, such as Dr. John Lott, have largely discredited this finding. One of the many problems with their finding is that the decrease in crime in the 90's (which the authors chalk up to abortion) was greatest among people born before Roe v. Wade, which is exactly the opposite of what you'd expect if their analysis was correct.
Other than their occasional slips to political bias, this book is very well written and makes for a good read, and I recommend it overall.
DANGEROUS BOOK August 12, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
This would be a dangerous book if Americans werent stupid and corrupt.
Its a page-flipper and definitely interesting.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
