|
Rules of Deception | 
 enlarge | Author: Christopher Reich
Publisher: Doubleday
Category: Book
List Price: $24.95
Buy Used: $5.00
You Save: $19.95 (80%)
New (60) Used (46) Collectible (3) from $5.00
Avg. Customer Rating:  63 reviews
Sales Rank: 3809
Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 400
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.5
Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.5 x 1.1
ISBN: 0385524064
Dewey Decimal Number: 813.54
EAN: 9780385524063
ASIN: 0385524064
Publication Date: July 15, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Millions of satisfied customers and climbing. Thriftbooks is the name you can trust, guaranteed. Spend Less. Read More.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Review
Lee Child on Rules of Deception
Lee Child has crafted one of literature's most popular anti-heroes in the form of Jack Reacher, the iconic ex-military policeman of his bestselling novels. The author of Nothing to Lose talks about what makes a good thriller -- and why Christopher Reich is a novelist worthy of a gold medal.
 I discovered Christopher Reich exactly ten years ago. His first book came out around the same time my second book was published. The modest prosperity that ones first book deal brings allowed me to pick up hardcovers that caught my eye. And Numbered Account caught my eye. And it lived up to its promise. It was fast, fresh, glossy, and very exciting. I thought: Reich is a keeper.
And then he got better. It was always clear that he had talent to burn, but he chose to accompany it with a real work ethic. His second, third and fourth books built and built until the release of the next one was an event to be anticipated. (And right there is my only complaint: Reich doesnt write fast enough.)
His fifth book - The Patriot's Club - was a real achievement. It was a slam-dunk winner of the International Thriller Writers first annual Best Novel award. Awards are often awkward. Theres usually a measure of grumbling, because often people dont agree with the choice of winner. But not a word was heard against "The Patriots Club." In fact nothing was heard, because the applause was too loud.
So I was really looking forward to Rules of Deception. I got an advance copy. I cracked it open. I started reading. Mostly I read like any other reader, but a small part of me reads like a writer. I think all writers experience the same thing. We sense things between the lines, especially energy and inspiration.
And ambition.
Rules of Deception starts with a short prologue, and then the first chapter introduces Jonathan Ransom, the main character. Two pages, and then nine pages. The prologue is a teaser. It baits the hook. Its a two-page masterpiece. Its intriguing, and then its really intriguing. It promises big things ahead. Then chapter one introduces the guy whos going to have to deal with them. And why, indirectly.
Eleven pages. The reader in me wanted to race ahead. But the writer in me had to pause a moment. Because between the lines I was sensing something. Maybe because its an Olympic year I can only explain it like this: picture the high jump event. Six competitors are still in. Then five, then four. Then three. Then the gold, the silver, and the bronze are settled. But the rules of track and field allow the winner to go on. The bar is raised. A personal best. The Olympic record. The bar is raised again. World record height. The stadium goes quiet. The jumper stills himself on the runway. Intense concentration. The gold medal is already in the bag. Uncharted territory. The jumper rocks from foot to foot, his mind on nothing except jumping higher than he has ever jumped before.
Thats exactly the between-the-lines feeling I was getting from Reich, eleven pages into Rules of Deception - a world-class writer preparing to accomplish something truly noteworthy.
There are a further 377 pages. They live up to the promise.
--Lee Child
Amazon Exclusive Essay: Christopher Reich on Thrillers
Name your five favorite books.
 For me theyre all thrillers. The Day of the Jackal, Eye of the Needle, The Bourne Identity , Noble House, and The Spy Who Came in From the Cold. My life stopped when I picked up each of those books and it didnt start again until I finished the last page. I didnt actually read them so much as disappear between their covers. That was me trying to catch the Jackal before he assassinated Charles De Gaulle, and me again at the wheel of a Jaguar XKE convertible racing down the Peak in Hong Kong. The fact is that for me life is somehow better when Im reading a great book. Richer, more excitingheck, I dont know, just better.
About two years ago, I decided that it was my turn to write the thriller Id always wanted to read. I knew exactly where to start. All I had to do was "write what I know." These days, I know a lot about the intelligence community. Not the stuff you read about in the papers -- the stuff you never read about. Over the years, Ive made a lot of friends in Washington and overseas. Diplomats, spies, soldiers, politicians men and women at the highest levels of government. And, I can assure you that what theyve taught me about how the world really works is a lot more interesting and a lot more frightening than youd ever imagine.
Thats where my newest book, Rules of Deception, comes in. Its a story about an honest and courageous doctor named Jonathan Ransom. Hes a surgeon who works for Doctors Without Borders in some of the toughest parts of the world. Hes a happily married man with a big heart and a beautiful English wife he deeply loves named Emma who works with him. What Jonathan doesnt know is that nothing about his life is what it seems. In fact, its all a web of lies and hes caught in the middle of something extraordinarily dangerous.
I cant say more than that, and I shouldnt have to, because if Ive done my job right, when you get to page five youll be hooked and you wont come up for air until its all said and done.
--Christopher Reich
Product Description
Dr. Jonathan Ransom, world-class mountaineer and surgeon for Doctors Without Borders, is climbing in the Swiss Alps with his beautiful wife, Emma, when a blizzard sets in. In their bid to escape the storm, Emma is killed when she falls into a hidden crevasse.
Twenty-four hours later, Jonathan receives an envelope addressed to his wife containing two baggage-claim tickets. Puzzled, he journeys to a remote railway station only to find himself in a life-and-death struggle for his wife’s possessions. In the aftermath of the assault, he discovers that his attackers—one dead, the other mortally wounded—were, in fact, Swiss police officers. More frightening still is evidence of an extraordinary act of betrayal that leaves Jonathan stunned.
Suddenly the subject of an international manhunt and the target of a master assassin, Jonathan is forced on the run. His only chance at survival lies in uncovering the devastating truth behind the secret his wife kept from him and in stopping the terrifying conspiracy that threatens to bring the world to the brink of annihilation. Step by step, he is drawn deeper into a world of spies, high-tech weaponry, and global terrorism—a world where no one is whom they appear to be and where the end always justifies the means.
Rules of Deception is a brilliantly conceived, twisting tale of intrigue and deceit written by the master of the espionage thriller for the twenty-first century.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 58 more reviews...
 Be careful with this one October 8, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
The book is an easy read. The quick chapters make it easy to follow. Pretty standard stuff, nothing that sets this book apart from many others. My only concern was the use of a Christian to take the role of the current Iranian President to bring about the "end of the world" by attacking/destroying either Israel or Iran. Author obviously has some personal religious issues that he uses this novel to display. Unfortunate that once again the media, in this case, this book, are used to disparage religious beliefs. Sure there are zealots on both sides. But to make it the main focus of a book. Personally, I was offended.
 By Way of Deception October 5, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I will first comment on the book's entertainment value and then on some aspects of the plot bearing on a serious, imminent national-security issue. If revelation of plot details will cause you distress, do not read any further.
I liked Reich's debut novel, `Numbered Account', and since then have enjoyed every one of his books. The present title is easily the most memorable. In its genre I think it far surpasses anything that, say, Ludlum ever did. There are some good unexpected plot twists. I found the characters and dialogue to be for the most part plausible and engaging. Note the impressive array of authors willing to be quoted by name on the dust jacket - unusual for a book of this nature.
I just have one problem. In the book, one of the evil conspiracies (there are several) has to do with provoking Israel to attack Iran in order to destroy its nuclear capabilities. Now it just so happens that, in reality, an actual conspiracy may be underway this very minute to accomplish that very same end - an attack on Iran -- in the not too distant future. The problem is that while Reich makes ingenious use of the very real tensions with Iran in the real world, readers not familiar with the Middle East may come away confused about what is happening between Iran, Israel, and the United States. As a novelist Reich is of course free to a certain extent to distort history or current events in order to entertain us. The problem is that entertainment does not always bring enlightenment, though sometimes does bring its opposite. Notwithstanding that the book is obvious fiction, and not intended as political commentary, many readers may wind up misled concerning the very serious issue of attacking Iran. Right here, right now, any confusion about the reasoning behind such an attack, or who exactly is pushing for it, is not a good thing. Let me explain.
In the book the two major conspirators are the head of CIA operations, Lafever, and the head of the intelligence arm of the Pentagon, Austen. They are operating against each other. Austen is an extreme Christian Zionist, a believer in `end times' whose goal is to cause `Armageddon' to occur, by fixing things so that Israel attacks Iran and Iran then reacts by launching a nuclear attack on Israel, to which the US will respond by destroying the entire Middle East (well, except for Jerusalem). The character of Austen was clearly inspired by the real-life individual William G. "Jerry" Boykin, a retired Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence in the Pentagon, a born-again Christian who has cast the "war on terror" in apocalyptic terms. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_G._Boykin)
How will Israel be induced to attack Iran? By (1) the US covertly providing Iran with the materials for production of enriched uranium required to build nuclear weapons; (2) making sure the Israelis find out; (3) arranging for the destruction of an EL-AL plane as it lands in Zurich, to give Israel the immediate provocation it would need to launch the attack; (4) providing Iran with cruise missiles capable of long-range delivery of their brand-new warheads, to be used to counter-attack Israel; and finally (5) keeping Israel ignorant of the fact that Iran could actually counter-attack.
Apparently unbeknownst to the Pentagon, Lafever and the CIA are aware of the conspiracy. Lafever acts to stop it, but only up to a point. He sends someone to kill the chief conspirators, but plans to allow the Israeli airliner to be shot down, to ensure that the Pentagon looks bad once they are `caught in the act' by the CIA, who will then win their political battle for the President's favor.
So there are two groups of bad guys and they are both agents of the United States. In the plot of `Rules of Deception', although Austen and Lafever are clearly intended to be seen for what they are - evil rogues - at least it cannot be said that America is failing to make its power felt around the world.
Israel on the other hand, as portrayed in the `Rules of Deception', is just caught in the middle, a passive agent, hardly any sort of conspirator, but rather the victim of conspirators. There are several scenes depicting meetings among the major Israeli actors including the prime minister and the head of Mossad, as they discuss how to deal with the discovery that Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons. I.e., whether and how to attack Iran. The author's depiction of these discussions clearly intends to be sympathetic, and it is noteworthy that there are no such scenes portraying the counterpart Iranian discussions or the American ones either, for that matter. Ironically, some of the Israeli dialogue is embarrassingly stupid, e.g., with the head of Mossad having to ask his subordinate what `dual-use goods' means (p. 152).
Iran also is portrayed as a victim, in part, insofar as it is manipulated by the American conspirators. However, Reich wants to have it both ways. He has the Israelis present their view that Iran is led by a madman who wishes to destroy Israel: "The president of Iran is a believer in the apocalyptic end times as stated in the Koran. He sees it as his personal mission to hasten the return of the twelfth Imam, known as the Mahdi.... It's written that his return will be preceded by a confrontation between the forces of good and evil that will see a period of prolonged warfare.... First, though, he has to destroy Israel." (p. 153) Ironically, just like Austen the Pentagon conspirator, the president of Iran - Ahmadinejad (unnamed in the book) - is apparently a crazy apocalypticist.
It seems that Reich is strongly sympathetic to this claim, pushed in the real world by Israel and its U.S. supporters, which seeks to justify an attack by the notion that, should Iran ever come to possess nuclear weapons, it would use them to - quoting Ahmadinejad -- "wipe Israel off the map". While much of the background plot in `Rules of Deception' is outlandish, here is one element which intersects with reality. To be sure, if Israel ever does attack Iran, it will not be because it was tricked into doing so by rogue elements within the United States. Rather the opposite. It will be because Israel refuses to tolerate Iranian possession of nuclear weapons, and because it succeeded in pressuring the United States into supporting an attack, via the argument that Iran is not a `rational actor'.
It is indisputable that Israel will not tolerate any Middle Eastern nation having nuclear weapons -- aside from itself of course, for which it is willing to make an exception. But here is one thing that is very much in dispute: are the Iranian leaders really crazy apocalypticists, and did Ahmadinejad really say he wanted to "wipe Israel off the map"? No to both, in my opinion, although I cannot justify it here. On the former, read Scott Ritter's `Target Iran' and decide for yourself. Ritter states: `Iran's threats to Israel today are purely rhetorical. Iran poses no direct threat to Israeli security that warrants any form of preemptive military action, especially when it comes to Iran's nuclear program'. (p. 207) On what Ahmadinejad did or did not say about `wipe Israel off the map', google away and be happy.
It is also indisputable that Israel has been pressuring the United States to attack Iran or else help Israel do so. See Ritter again, chapter one, `A Crisis Made in Israel'.
The sad fact is that, as I am writing this 30 days before the presidential election, an attack against Iran is a real possibility. Israel has been clamoring for it, and the Israeli lobby, in the widest sense of that term, has been actively promoting it within the U.S. government and media. The timing right now may be critical, because with Obama poised to win the election, the Israelis must feel that they will lose the opportunity unless they act soon. It is certain that no such attack can occur without the collusion and foreknowledge of the United States. But is the current Bush regime willing to go along? So far, the answer seems to be No. The grownups in the administration seem to recognize that, given the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran's non-negligible military strength, and the certainty that oil prices would soar unimaginably higher, an attack on Iran would be a monumental folly. And now with the financial-system meltdown underway, it seems impossible to imagine any scenario where the United States accedes to Israel's wishes to attack Iran. Let us pray that this analysis is correct.
Rules of Deception October 5, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Lefties will love this book. The main hero character is a Peace Corps type who represents everything good in the world. Along with a (wouldn't you know) Swiss police official who is also good and of high moral values, try to thwart the villains who are of course nutballs that head the CIA and the evil of all evils, the head of military intelligence. Reich also drags Christian Religion into the mix as of course part of one of the villain's mental make up. If you are like me and tired of liberals portraying America in a bad light then don't bother with this book.
 This is a keeper!! October 4, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I hadn't read a Christopher Reich novel in a while and this one quickly reminded me as to what an entertaining and accomplished writer he is. The story quickly drags you inside the covers of the book and keeps things churning as Jonathan Ransom is drawn deeper and deeper into a mystery that was not of his making.
Things are seldom what they seem in this story of intrigue and mystery and sorting out the threats and the realities is as challenging to the reader as it is to him.
You will have a difficult time putting this one down. The Rules of Deception is a keeper.
So much wasted potential... September 28, 2008
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Jonathan Ransom is devastated when his wife Emma is killed in an accident while they are climbing in the Swiss Alps. He has little time to mourn however, because shortly after her death he receives a mysterious package in the mail which was intended for his wife. Along with Emma's best friend Simone, he attempts to trace the origin and the meaning of the package. In the process he becomes embroiled in an international conspiracy, and in his pursuit of answers he becomes a suspect.
Though this story has a lot of potential, in some ways it is poorly executed. The pacing is inconsistent. The first half of the book contains lengthy chapters that each feature a different set of characters. I found myself confused about who everyone was and what they had to do with anything. At the halfway point of the book. Reich abruptly shifts to Patterson-style chapters of a few pages in length. Also, the plot twists get more outrageous; if not for Reich's fine writing (which is considerably elevated above others in the spy genre) some would have been laughable.
Also, there are some loose ends that never get tied up. For example, the book opens with a butterfly fluttering around what may be a nuclear test site. There are descriptions of shady butterfly-pin-wearing men whose motives are not understood. Even the cover art features a butterfly. After the first couple of pages the author's interest in butterflies apparently becomes extinct, and after finishing the book I still was not clear about what was up with the butterflies.
Usually movie adaptations of books are disappointing, but this book could make a movie that is better than its source material. The characters of Ransom and Simone are likable, and the action scenes which take place across the globe would play well on the big screen. Hopefully whoever does the screen adaptation can fix some of Reich's mistakes.
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
