The Book On Sports

Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » All Sports Books » Environmental Science » Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming  
Categories
All Sports Books
Baseball
Football
Basketball
Golf
Soccer
Extreme Sports
Fantasy Sports
Gambling
For the best in golf writing, golf reviews, golf news and golf opinion, visit GolfBlogger

Books On Technology, Computers and the Internet

Discount Golf Equipment

Related Categories
• Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Science
Subjects
Books
• Climate Changes
Climatology
Earth Sciences
Science
Subjects
• Conservation
Environment
Outdoors & Nature
Subjects
Books
• Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Professional Science
Professional & Technical
Subjects
• Public Policy
Political Science
Social Sciences
Nonfiction
Subjects
• Science: Earth Sciences: General
General
Archive
Custom Stores
Specialty Stores
• Science: General
General
Archive
Custom Stores
Specialty Stores
• Professional & Technical: Professional Science: Earth Sciences: General
General
Archive
Custom Stores
Specialty Stores
• Look Inside Outdoors & Nature Books
Trip
Specialty Stores
Books
• Hardcover
Format (binding)
Refinements
Books
• Printed Books
Binding (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
Books

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming

zoom enlarge 
Author: Bjorn Lomborg
Publisher: Knopf
Category: Book

List Price: $21.00
Buy New: $12.47
You Save: $8.53 (41%)



New (36) Used (11) Collectible (1) from $12.00

Avg. Customer Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars 83 reviews
Sales Rank: 1625

Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 272
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 4.9 x 1.2

ISBN: 0307266923
Dewey Decimal Number: 363.73874
EAN: 9780307266927
ASIN: 0307266923

Publication Date: September 4, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand new book. Over 3.5 million customers served. Order now. Selling books online since 1995. Order with confidence. Code: B20080516225610T

Also Available In:

  • Kindle Edition - Cool It
  • Paperback - Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming (Vintage)

Similar Items:

  • The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World
  • Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years,Updated and Expanded Edition
  • Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy
  • Global Crises, Global Solutions
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)

Editorial Reviews:

Amazon.com
Amazon.com Guest Reviewer: Michael Crichton
In his many science-themed bestsellers--including The Andromeda Strain, Jurassic Park, Prey, and most recently, Next--Michael Crichton has covered everything from genetically engineered dinosaurs to time travel to nantechnology run amok. Having cast his own views on the dangers and hysteria surrounding global warming with State of Fear, he turns his pen toward the often controversial Bjorn Lomborg and his latest book, Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming.




Bjorn Lomborg is the best-informed and most humane advocate for environmental change in the world today. In contrast to other figures that promote a single issue while ignoring others, Lomborg views the globe as a whole, studies all the problems we face, ranks them, and determines how best, and in what order, we should address them. His first book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, established the importance of a fact-based approach. With later books, Global Crises, Global Solutions and How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place, this mild-mannered Danish statistician has steadily gained new converts. Not surprisingly, Time Magazine named him one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming will further enhance Lomborg's reputation for global analysis and thoughtful response. For anyone who wants an overview of the global warming debate from an objective source, this brief text is a perfect place to start. Lomborg is only interested in real problems, and he has no patience with media fear-mongering; he begins by dispatching the myth of the endangered polar bears, showing that this Disneyesque cartoon has no relevance to the real world where polar bear populations are in fact increasing. Lomborg considers the issue in detail, citing sources from Al Gore to the World Wildlife Fund, then demonstrating that polar bear populations have actually increased five fold since the 1960s.

Lomborg then works his way through the concerns we hear so much about: higher temperatures, heat deaths, species extinctions, the cost of cutting carbon, the technology to do it. Lomborg believes firmly in climate change--despite his critics, he's no denier--but his fact-based approach, grounded in economic analyses, leads him again and again to a different view. He reviews published estimates of the cost of climate change, and the cost of addressing it, and concludes that "we actually end up paying more for a partial solution than the cost of the entire problem. That is a bad deal."

In some of the most disturbing chapters, Lomborg recounts what leading climate figures have said about anyone who questions the orthodoxy, thus demonstrating the illiberal, antidemocratic tone of the current debate. Lomborg himself takes the larger view, explaining in detail why the tone of hysteria is inappropriate to addressing the problems we face.

In the end, Lomborg's concerns embrace the planet. He contrasts our concern for climate with other concerns such as HIV/AIDS, malnutrition, and providing clean water to the world. In the end, his ability to put climate in a global perspective is perhaps the book's greatest value. Lomborg and Cool It are our best guides to our shared environmental future.

--Michael Crichton

(photo credit: Jonathan Exley)




Product Description

A groundbreaking book that transforms the debate about global warming by offering a fresh perspective based on human needs as well as environmental concerns.

Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world’s temperature for hundreds of years. Rather than starting with the most radical procedures, Lomborg argues that we should first focus our resources on more immediate concerns, such as fighting malaria and HIV/AIDS and assuring and maintaining a safe, fresh water supply—which can be addressed at a fraction of the cost and save millions of lives within our lifetime. He asks why the debate over climate change has stifled rational dialogue and killed meaningful dissent.

Lomborg presents us with a second generation of thinking on global warming that believes panic is neither warranted nor a constructive place from which to deal with any of humanity’s problems, not just global warming. Cool It promises to be one of the most talked about and influential books of our time.




Customer Reviews:   Read 78 more reviews...

1 out of 5 stars an okay novel, like State of Fear and Congo   May 13, 2008
 3 out of 9 found this review helpful

although his attempt to base his story in the "real world" would meet more success if he didn't pull his commentary from random web sources and company press clippings. he should do a little more research into the background of his characters too, the sorcerer's apprentice has more real science cred than this hack.


5 out of 5 stars A Reasonable Approach to Climate Change   May 10, 2008
 1 out of 1 found this review helpful

This book is beautifully written, and can easily be read in a few hours.
The general idea the author presents is that while "Global Warming" is
real and problematic, there has been too much apocalyptic material written
spoken and propagated in the media. He is particularly hard on Mr. Gore
whom he feels has (among other things) predicted an unrealistic rise in sea levels. He is also hard on the Kyoto Treaty.
Mr. Lomborg is an economist, not a physical scientist. Many of his arguments
concern costs and benefits. He tends to produce "facts" and "figures" in a somewhat oracular manner - one supposes that the references he provides
substantiate these assertions. This is the price paid for a terse readable presentation.
I tend to agree with the idea that heroic measures to control carbon dioxide emissions are politically difficult if not impossible.
The author prefers to spend the money on other human needs where the benefits seem more in line with the expenditures : clean water, fighting diseases etc.
I found particularly interesting his idea that the benefits of global warming( fewer deaths from cold for example) might offset some of the bad effects. Here the oracular statistics were prominent- how could he state so surely the number of lives saved from hypothermia ?
I will continue to read Lomborg's work which is always interesting.



3 out of 5 stars Systematic Bias in Amazon Editorial Reviews   April 28, 2008
 9 out of 10 found this review helpful

This is just a quick "meta-" review; a review of the reviews.

The Editorial review section leads off with the Reed Elsevier review, trashing Lomborg, followed by Tim Flannery "...an Australian mammalogist, palaeontologist and *global warming activist*," [Wikipedia] again, trashing Lomborg. The Reed Elsevier folks, who apparently handle all the Publishers Weekly reviews, are notable for their Environmentalist bias, as well as a consistently Left bias in every other area in which I've sampled their reviews. If the "Editorial Reviews" section of Amazon.com is supposed to be in any way more authoritative or balanced than the reader reviews section, Amazon may want to look for a more objective source. In fact, many of the user reviews below appear to be better-researched and more objective than the professional lead pieces.

I have my issues with Lomborg opposite theirs. He has become a weak-middle advocate for sanity in the "Global Warming" debates, because he considers GW to be essentially settled science, minus the hysteria -- "let's just deal with it (GW) rationally." I don't agree with the concession, to disclose my bias, but let's grant his stance for sake of discussion.

The "models" and "studies" Reed Elsevier trots out (without name, content, or reference) that he supposedly "ignores" could be counter-posed to corrections to midleading temperature "corrections" where the NASA data shows no consistent upward trend, solar minima, and other issues that the GW advocates have marginalized or ignored outright.

The "Washington Post" review is not a "Washington Post Review," it's a slanted attack by an envirnomental activist with an agenda. Since it's not identified that way, it's dishonest.

Evidently, it's enough to disparage with a journalistic sneer to qualify as a qualified reviewer,now, so I respond in kind to the Reed people. Publishers Weekly -- get yourself reviewers that will review the book, not smear it and distort facts in order to push their own agenda.

And, again, Amazon's informed, intelligent user community demonstrates why the mainstream media are losing eyeballs, while the blogosphere grows and broadens in influence.



5 out of 5 stars Sensible proposals for coping with the consequences of global warming   April 28, 2008
 5 out of 9 found this review helpful

Bjorn Lomborg, an adjunct professor at Copenhagen Business School and author of The Skeptical Environmentalist, has written another well-researched book. As he writes, "Global warming is happening, the consequences are important and mostly negative." He notes that the 2007 International Panel on Climate Change has predicted rises of 1.50C by 2050 and 2.50C by 2100, which will raise sea levels and increase malaria, starvation and poverty.

But, Lomborg argues, it does not follow that directly combating climate change through cutting CO2 will do most to maximise human welfare. Preventing disease, providing clean drinking water and feeding people could do more good more cheaply.

What are the options? We could, for example, spend $3 billion a year on mosquito eradication, medicine and mosquito nets: this would halve malaria incidence (2 billion infections and one million deaths every year) by 2015. We could spend $4 billion a year on helping three billion people to access clean water and sanitation.

Or, by contrast, we could do what the EU tells us and spend $84 trillion to cut CO2 emissions to 20% below 1990 levels, to ensure that the temperature rises by no more than 20C above pre-industrial times. Yet this hugely expensive effort would have only a tiny effect: it would be 2.480C hotter than now by 2100 instead of by 2098. And a 2.5% rise is only what the IPCC predicted would happen anyway! As a 2007 peer-reviewed study in the journal Energy Policy concluded, "the 20C target of the EU seems unfounded."

Lomborg shows that the consequences of global warming will not be as bad as they have been painted. For example, the IPCC predicted that sea-levels would rise by 29 cm by 2100 (the same as the rise since 1860), as against the 20 feet that Al Gore publicises. We could cope with this by better use of floodplains, more wetlands, stricter building policies and fewer floodplain subsidies.

Lomborg shows that global warming does not cause extreme weather events, which are anyway not curable by cutting CO2. The IPCC said of the Hollywood/Pentagon/Al Gore picture of a new ice age triggered by a shutdown of the Gulf Stream, "we can confidently exclude this scenario."

Fossil fuels have grown the industries that produce the goods we need and give us low-cost light, heat, food, travel and trade. As Lomborg writes, "a world without fossil fuels ... is a lot like a world gone medieval." So he argues that we need to spend far more on researching renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Directly cutting CO2 would be hugely expensive. Lomborg argues that we should do what is both cheaper and more effective - cope with the consequences of global warming rather than try to stop it at source. If he is right, we would maximise human welfare not by rolling back our civilisation's industrial advance, but by using our industrial ingenuity and know-how to prevent disease, provide people with food and water, and develop energy resources.



5 out of 5 stars a thoughtful treatse   April 27, 2008
 1 out of 3 found this review helpful

this book is a good review about the problems associated with global warming.It shows where the science either has been ignored or not reported in the press. Too often we are victims of the popular press. They seem to want to change opinions by using sound bites and not giving details. The problem of global warming is that it is here but all the info about the real cause is being ignored.We may find ourselves paying enormous amounts of money chasing a red herring.
A good example of attempting to solve the problem before looking at the consequences is the rush to use food for fuel. We as Americans certainlyneed to conserve but using food to fuel our cars is stupid. Here we have the case of seeking a simple solution to a complex problem.
I recommend this book as another way to look at the problem. The answers are not readily available but we do need to consider all aspects before we take the next steps. As a caution I feel that too much time has been spent listening to politicians and hollywood.


Powered by Associate-O-Matic

Contact The Book On Sports