Fire in the Night: Wingate of Burma, Ethiopia, and Zion | 
enlarge | Authors: John Bierman, Colin Smith Publisher: Random House Category: Book
List Price: $29.95 Buy Used: $14.25 You Save: $15.70 (52%)
Used (12) from $14.25
Avg. Customer Rating: 11 reviews Sales Rank: 138393
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1st ed Pages: 448 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 9.5 x 6.8 x 1.3
ISBN: 0375500618 Dewey Decimal Number: 940.5423 EAN: 9780375500619 ASIN: 0375500618
Publication Date: December 28, 1999 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Few men have made as outstanding contributions to their country's cause as Orde Wingate, yet few have divided opinion so completely. "We don't want any more Wingates in the British Army," says an Army Council minute written after the end of the Second World War, and after his death. In contrast, no less than Winston Churchill himself said, before the House of Commons, "There was a man of genius, who might well have become a man of destiny." John Bierman and Colin Smith's enlightening and rigorous biography of this brilliant man amply demonstrates how the conservative establishment of the British Army could come to adopt such an ungracious attitude to one of their most dynamic sons, who contributed so much to the war effort with dazzling performances in Abyssinia and Burma, and so much to future strategic thinking with his bold formulation of new methods. He ruffled feathers with his uncompromising style, unconventional thinking, and eccentric nature (perhaps most memorably expressed in his unaffected penchant for receiving visitors in the nude). Together with an acute intelligence and great breadth of learning, Wingate was a man possessed of awe-inspiring will and single-minded application, and he was often seen flying into a rage when things were not done as he thought they should be. Many, regardless of rank, felt the lash of his tongue. His almost fanatical commitment to the cause of Zionism, a highly sensitive and ambivalent political hot potato for the British at the time, seems also to have rankled many who simply could not understand a man so unlike the typical public-school-educated officer. Although not Jewish himself, to this day he is widely honored in Israel. Zvi Brenner, his Jewish bodyguard in Palestine before the war when he was commanding the Special Night Squads, elegantly encapsulated the man when, in describing Wingate's uncanny ability to negotiate all terrain in darkness, he said, "Wingate didn't follow any paths but walked in straight lines." A truly exceptional man; there is, unfortunately, little chance of the British Army's having any more Wingates. --Alisdair Bowles, Amazon.co.uk
Book Description Winston Churchill thought he was a military genius; others considered him greatly overrated; a few even thought him mad. Almost sixty years after his death at age forty-four in an airplane crash, Orde Wingate remains perhaps the most controversial of all World War II commanders.
Born into a fundamentalist Christian sect and raised in the Cromwellian tradition of Sword and Bible, Wingate was an odd mixture of religious mystic and idealist, combining an unshakable belief in an Old Testament God with an insatiable interest in music, literature, history, philosophy, and the politics of his day.
But his overriding and enduring passion was for Zionism, a cause that--although he had no Jewish blood--he embraced when posted to British-ruled Palestine in 1936. There he raised the Special Night Squads, an irregular force that decimated Arab rebel bands and taught a future generation of Israeli generals how to fight.
In 1941, Wingate led another guerrilla-style force, this time into Italian-occupied Ethiopia, where he was instrumental in restoring Emperor Haile Selassie to his throne. But the campaign that was to bring him world fame was conducted behind enemy lines in Burma, where his Chindits shattered the myth of Japanese invincibility in jungle fighting, giving Allied morale a much-needed boost at a crucial point in World War II.
Throughout his career, Wingate's unconventionality and disdain for the superiors he dismissed as "military apes" marked him as a difficult if not impossible subordinate. He was that, but also, as this vigorous new study reveals, an inspiring leader.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 6 more reviews...
"ORDE WINGATE: IRREGULAR SOLDIER"-book by Trevor Royle May 26, 2007 1 out of 3 found this review helpful
My mother thought Orde reminded her of Stonewall Jackson of American Civil war fame. There are many similarities between the two, but I think Trevor Royle's book title nails his character right on the head. Both Jackson and Wingate were average military scholars, but brilliant field commanders. They had no equal on the field in terms of battle tactics. Both were deeply religious, both eccentric, though in very different ways. Both were Gideons of the supreme, heavenly order. I am convinced if Stonewall were alive today, he would be an ardent zionist as Orde became when his command led him to palestine in pre-WWII years. Orde's first assignment was in the Sudan where he became fluent in Arabic. His Hebrew which he tried to learn was terrible according to Moshe Dayan. His few days in palestine, however, bore much fruit in that he taught the jews of palestine tactics which would help transform the IDF into the amazing fighting force today and which served them extremely well in the immediate days and years following.
Orde's success in restoring the Ethiopian empire to Haile Selassie was definitely Stonewallian. How he routed the entire Italian fascist force residing in Ethiopia with a small force was little short of miraculous.
I don't think Stonewall was as outspoken as Orde and was a bit surprised at how Orde got by with some of his very strong opinions which he was not afraid to voice. That for me was the biggest contrast between the two.
Most important, I think, about Wingate was what he had accomplished in the jungles of the far east where he died in a tragic aviation accident during WWII.
This book was thoroughly enjoyable, is well written, but I defer to the better judgement of one of my favorite Amazon friends and recommend Royle's book as being most accurate as to Orde's views of the jews and palestine. This book was a good prelude to me, a good introduction into the life and character of this most remarkable of British soldiers, Orde Wingate.
Gifted, Offbeat But Marginal Hero April 27, 2007 8 out of 8 found this review helpful
Like Lawrence of Arabia, Orde Wingate is a perennially fascinating figure of the later British Empire and era of World Wars I and II. Unlike Lawrence, Wingate was not a literary artist who immortalized his own career, so we rely on biographies to understand him. This work is thorough if not definitive, using a wide array of sources to describe his military/political adventures in Palestine, Ethiopia, and finally Burma where his long-range penetration strategy was most publicized and problematic, but at least partly successful. Such a forceful, idiosyncratic figure will always stimulate controversy, and the authors explore the disagreements well enough, though they cannot satisfy all readers. Why marginal? Wingate's and Lawrence's successes, and failures, occurred in peripheral theaters of both wars. Scholars debate whether such operations significantly influenced the outcome of campaigns in Africa, Southwest and Southeast Asia, or primarily served to expand or protect the Empire. But major (and costly) sea, air and especially land campaigns were essential to winning world wars; the character of 20th century total war effectively marginalized the efforts and the theaters where romantic individualists fought, though they remain dashing, compelling figures. "Fire in the Night" is exciting and deserves 4-5 stars taken on its own terms, but excess attention given to special ops ultimately obscures the nature of Allied triumphs. A. Mockler, "Haile Selassie's War" narrates the 1935-41 Ethiopian conflict. In "Defeat Into Victory" William Slim recounts the inspiring reconquest of Burma, with pointed critiques but general praise for his difficult subordinate. (The authors seem overly hard on Slim in this respect.) J. Nunneley, "Tales from the King's African Rifles" captures well the brutal, unglamorous experience of most Burma veterans.
incomplete portrait of a complex figure July 22, 2004 14 out of 22 found this review helpful
Like many sources, this book praises wingate without enough careful examination of his flaws. The book focuses mostly on three chapters in Wingate's life. It starts with his service in palestine in 1936. Driven by religious fanaticism and his contempt for what he saw as uncivilized peoples (arabs or any non-europeans really), he attached himself to Zionism and zionist politicians. In the process he exceeded or ignored his orders, then after politically compromised himself in open alliance with zionist groups to a point where he could not possibly serve there. His great "vision" for the region was for a "sub-empire" with Zionists serving as a sort of spartan military elite to subdue and westernize those considered lesser humans. All as part of some sort of twisted fanatical vision of christianity. After having been booted out of Palestine, he eventually ended up in Ethiopia where he again ignored his orders. His goal this time was to force a royal government on Ethiopia regardless of what anyone else thought and in spite of serious reservations on the part of politicians and his superiors. His campaign was a wonderful "boys adventure" sort of a affair, but in the end it was army won the campaign. Wingate's great accomplishment was saddling Ethiopia with an unstable and territorially aggressive monarchy that eventually collapsed in a bloodbath in the 1970s. After, he went into open revolt against the entire leadership of the army in the area. He openly insulted them and held them in utter contempt. In his mind, though he had never held a position of high responsiblity in the army, he saw himself as being some sort of grand illustrious figure. And when his campaign of alination, insults and personal attacks failed to get him recognition, he attempted suicide. Contrary to the book, his megolmania and self-destructive behavior would indicate someone with serious problems rather than a great leader. He was rescued from career oblivion by a friend in India. He was sent into Burma in 1942 to see what could be done in the way of irregular warfare. For all his bluster, he did nothing. And beyond that, while other men were suffering and dying on the march back to India, Wingate arranged to be flown out. Back in India, he was given a brigade to test out his theories with. He whined about what he was given in terms of men. He only wanted british soldiers. He threw the men into jungle camps during the monsoon with the idea that by inflicting the maximum amount of suffering and disease, that british men who had his opinion been weakened by access to health care and doctors in britain would be made strong again. When the casualty rate reached over 50%, he moved the men into regular housing and they recovered. The book presents the self-serving fiction that the casulaty rate declined due to weeding out "bad men" when in reality it only improved because the monsoon ended and the worst of the camps was abandoned. Wingate's first mission into Burma served no real purpose. It was originally to be part of a broader plan, but when the broader plan was cancelled, wingate demanded that the operation go ahead anyway as a training exercise. He led the men into Burma, put a railway out of operation for a few weeks and then led his men deep into Burma where they accomplished nothing. Eventually, Wingate executed one of his brilliant strategies to solve the situation. He broke up his command and effectively gave the order every man for himself. The force or more properly what survived of the force returned in small parties to India. Once back, Wingate ignored his men in favor of launching a press and publicity campaign on his achivements. He wrote a self-serving account of operations and when his commanders raised objects to it, he arranged for a copy to be given directly to Churchill and the cabinet. Wingate decided to bypass the entire army and come under the patronage of politicians. The politicans heard about the brilliant victory, but they did not hear about the officer running naked in the jungle or of the man who believed bringing back flogging was necessary for real dicipline. When he returned to India in the fall of 1943, he fell ill because he had recklessly drank contaminated water in north africa on the way back. He had been given a blank cheque for any resources he wanted for operations in Burma. However, due to a combination of him being out of the country and ill, his operational role in developing the second chindit force wasn't very large. Eventually, an plan was thrown together for operations in 1944. Rather than being an evolution of his supposed theories, it mostly involved a new idea of fighting a special operations war with a division-sized formation operating from large bases in enemy controlled territory. Wingate died early on during the operation so its impossible to know what would have been the result if he had lived. However, the only other time his 1944 strategy was used was by the French in Vietnam where it led to total disaster. Wingate has a number of followers. Obviously, Israelis are greatful for the help he provided in forming what eventually became their army. There are also those who, like wingate, who see the british army as a failed institution and somehow see innovation in the form of a man who cut his own throat, ran around naked in camp, wanted to bring back flogging and credited broader access to good health care in civilian life as being responsible for weakening the british soldier. A good work on Wingate has to deal with the positive aspects and the negative ones. Too many draw a one-sided portrait (including this one) while sweeping the not so nice parts of the story under the rug.
NOT THE STANDARD WARRIOR GENTLEMAN March 18, 2004 9 out of 11 found this review helpful
Having been brought up on stories from my early years about the brave and often forgotten exploits of the Chindits I was very enthused to tuck into this book. Orde Wingate has been the hero of many, not so much because he was a military successful warrior, but because he was wildly unconventional at a time when staid ethics and methods of war were leading to defeats of the western allies on all fronts. A fierce Old Testament fear and learning of the bible bread in what would now be called a fundementalist christian family, he blended this with [...] eccentricities like, indifference to appearing nude before his collegues and newspapermen, a complete indifference to British Monarchy and the hierarchical class-bound society and way of thinking. An appreciator of new ideas and probably quite to the left of many of his superiors, he had no hestation in punishing and physically striking his recruits (no matter their colour), and could kill the enemy mercilessly, or order large groups knowingly to their death without a blink. Wingate pioneered unconventional warfare with his notion that large unit groups can function in the rear of the enemy for long periods of time if they were self-sufficient and well trained. He eschewed the entire idea of "special forces" as they are often called nowadays. In the end I do not think that he squared the circle large unit action and special forces --- he wanted both and got really neither. His tactics worked rather well against the Italians (but that was no surprise he realised), but they were problematic against the Japanese. The first operation, "Long Cloth" was an unmitigated disaster, with enough adventures from its many participants to fill an entire library (they still make some of the most heart thumping reads available). The entire operation broke down and became in some cases, every man for himself. Wingate himself giving the order. His second operation was more problematic. No doubt these operations had significant effect on the enemy and no doubt were very helpful in the taking of Myikyena and Mogang, but I really think that 14th Army would have rolled up the Japanese flank nicely anyway, as they did and win the Battle of Burma with overwhelming firepower and troops as well unmitigated air superiority. In the end the Japanese in Burma were beaten by traditional large unit engagements. That is not a defeat of the ideas of Orde Wingate, nor do they negate the incredible bravery of the men who served with him. What it does DO however is to put to rest the idea that Orde Wingate was a purveyor of "Truth" -- his ideas were worthy, but they were not the be-all end-all of jungle combat. His developments were prodigeous and his personal bravery never in doubt. But I think that, like Moses, he got involved too much in fanatical devotion to one idea and was willing to sacrifice a lot for an idea. In the case of Moses, his people --- in the case of Wingate, it was often his own troops. This books admirably chronicles the multifacted nature of Wingate. It is factual and comes across as neutral as possible, often citing critical sources and those men (also of incredible courage) that did not fall under his spell. The narrative is tight and WELL EDITED. Unlike your regular 1000 page biography Smith and Beirman are able to deal with the subject adequately in 400 pages with nothing substantive missing. Also there is just enough detail of almost all of his life. The final 150 pages deals with the Burma campaign the authors are very skillful in their use of detail. They include all of the crucial elements necessary of his many campaigns. I found the book to be a very admirable read. I think that it only deepened the questions I have about Wingate --- was he a daring experimenter or a madman? --- I think that one can add, bitterly-troubled person to the heap of other appelations surrounding this man. I still ask myself, if this man were my commander would I succumb and become a convert? Would I stand aloof and protest that something is terribly wrong? I do not know, and cannot judge because I was not born at the time these events transpired. I was not a part of this great crusade, the glory they gained or the horrors they endured.
Extraordinary story of a unique person February 25, 2004 10 out of 22 found this review helpful
This is actually three wonderful stories in one. Beginning with a short introduction of the `early years' the book quickly opens with Wingate in 1936 Palestine/Zion where is quickly discovers the passion that he will keep for the rest of his life, namely Zionism. Wingate, witnessing the anti-Semitic nature of the British officer corps, gravitates towards the Zionists due to his penchant for sticking out and backing underdog causes. This book tells the riveting story of Wingate's training and arming of the famous `night squads' which became the backbone of the Palmach who eventually led Israel to victory in the 1948 war.The second story is the story of Wingate in Africa. Exiled to Africa because of his deep connections to the Zionists Wingate once again latches onto a new cause, the 1941 liberation of Ethiopia, which had been the last free African state before the Italians invaded it. The third story is where Wingate once again shined, namely in Burma leading the Chindits who operated behind enemy lines fighting the Japanese. Once again Wingate's penchant for native causes and brilliant ability to adapt unorthodox fighting techniques helped prepare the way for British victory. Churchill called Wingate a genius and when you read this book you will wholeheartedly agree, this is truly the story of the man who was the `fire in the night' when the world was becoming dark with fascism. Seth J. Frantzman
|
|
|