|
Leave Us Alone: Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives | 
enlarge | Author: Grover Norquist Publisher: William Morrow Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy New: $13.47 You Save: $13.48 (50%)
New (35) Used (14) from $13.23
Avg. Customer Rating: 15 reviews Sales Rank: 16754
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 384 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4 Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 5.9 x 1.5
ISBN: 0061133957 Dewey Decimal Number: 320.520973 EAN: 9780061133954 ASIN: 0061133957
Publication Date: March 1, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New. 100% money back guarantee. All books shipped from Strand Bookstore, New York City, USA.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
One of the nation's most influential political strategists provides a daring manifesto and vision for conservatives. The modern Republican party is a coalition of groups and tendencies created during the political life of Ronald Reagan, based on principle rather than region and history. The new political movement that now controls much of the Republican party is one of Americans who simply wish to be left alone by the government. They are not asking the government for others' money, time, or attention. Rather, they want to be free to own a gun, homeschool their children, pray, invest their money, and control their own destiny. They are the Leave Us Alone coalition, at the heart of the center-right, and Grover Norquist argues that it will grow in power and size during the next generation. Directly opposed to this coalition is the descriptively titled Takings Coalition, which is at the heart of the tax-and-spend left, and they will battle for control of America's future over the next fifty years. It is increasingly important to better understand these coalitions than it is the Republican or Democratic parties themselves. In a compelling and powerful narrative, Norquist describes the two competing coalitions in American politics, how they are organized, what makes them stronger or weaker. What each can achieve and what they cannot do. And how you may fit into the contest as well as gain a deeper understanding of American politics—where it's been, where it is and particularly where it will go—through a series of eye-opening economic, demographic, and political trends that will shape these coalitions in the years to come. Required reading for any conservative who wants a deeper understanding of politics in America today, Leave Us Alone shows the order of battle for the next generation.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 10 more reviews...
Grover's Nonsense June 13, 2008 1 out of 11 found this review helpful
Grover earns a decent living coming up with all this nonsense about small government and low taxes. He gets the ignorant dupes in our society all whipped into a frenzy and gets paid more by us wealthy folks who sit in the padded bleachers and cheer him on while we continue to get lower taxes and build up our plutocratic government.
Grover's fans will never realize that their life began under government (the marriage license)and continues under a government held together by taxes and people who want to work together for a better life and not a self-interested and greedy existence filled with vanity and pride and phony John Wayne antics. He refers to Reagan but doesn't tell his fans that Reagan's term started the US slide to mediocrity.
The Take folks will be the ones to put the regulations on capitalism needed to lead a sane life. They will eventually bring back an educational system which will create a homogeneous society instead of a cacaphony of educational attempts by parents which would lead to a balkanized US where people in one county cannot understand what people in the neighboring county are talking about because they were taught different english languages by their slow witted parents.
"Only those who chose their parents and planned their entire life while in the womb deserve credit for success; all others deserve what everyone else does."
Keep hope alive -- the country can still turn in the right direction June 3, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Grover Norquist uses an impressive array of facts and statistics to demonstrate that we do not have to inevitably become more and more like France. Deep economic, demographic and political trends exist that will make real Tax Reform and much more limited government possible. The book contains a plan that outlines how this can actually be done. It seems daunting right now, being faced with the possibility of Carter follows Nixon scenario, but the author has identified some basic long term trends that do indeed keep hope alive
Great start for frustrated archo-libertarian/republican reformist May 28, 2008 Read the book after seeing Grover in C-SPAN. Great effort. I agree with 90+% of it. Take that, Mr. Bush, 43!
Marred by Misinformation May 27, 2008 4 out of 7 found this review helpful
Grover Norquist is a smart man. He understands that when making a comparison, you have to compare apples to apples.
And yet, in his book "Leave Us Alone" he notes that in 1994 Republicans running for Congress got 39% of the Hispanic vote, whereas in 2006 (after indulging in what Grover calls "Anti-Immigration Rhetoric") they got 31% of the Hispanic vote.
Now the problem with this comparison is that it's not AT ALL surprising that the Republicans did better than they usually do with the Hispanics in 1994, a year the Republicans were riding high and retook the Majority. And in the exact same way, it isn't at all surprising that the Republicans did worse with Hispanics than they usually do in 2006, when they lost the Majority.
If Grover wanted to behave like a scientific man, and not like a mere propagandist, he would've compared the Republican share of the Hispanic congressional vote in 2006 to the Republican share of the Hispanic congressional vote in another of the many years where Republicans did badly across all demographics.
And while I'd like to think this was an honest mistake, and if Grover Norquist merely apologizes for it I'll take him at his word and forgive him, I very much doubt it was a mistake.
As I said, Grover Norquist is a smart man, and when he makes basic logical errors you can bet your life he's trying to deceive people.
And in this case his motive is very evil, as he is trying to scare Conservative Republicans into bowing before the altar of open borders, tolerance for sanctuary cities, giving amnesty to illegal immigrants, and whatever else the corporate elites tell us to gutlessly give away to the Hispanics to try and get them to vote for us.
Never mind that in whatever City or Congressional District Hispanics become the majority, the Republican Party DIES.
Never mind that the only hope of the Democratic Party to take over states like South Carolina is if the Hispanic population there grows large enough that together with the Blacks they overwhelm the voting power of the White Conservatives who currently control the state.
The thing I find so frustrating about Norquist is that he's usually so logical, but then when it comes to the immigration issue he'll shamelessly promote some of the most obvious fallacies imaginable.
Another example of his utter shamelessness when it comes to immigration is how as a part of his effort to get Muslims to vote for George W. Bush in 2000, he aggressively courted a Arab Professor in Florida who was widely known for his ties to major Terrorist Organizations like Hamas and who was later arrested by the FBI and convicted by a federal court.
In Grover Norquist's eyes all immigrants are good and their votes worth giving nearly anything to get, even if they break the law and happen to be involved in trying to take down the Western World.
I wonder how many more dead Americans it will take before Grover Norquist stops supporting liberal immigration policies that only benefit cheap labor lovers like the Chamber of Commerce, Mexican Supremacist Orgs like La Raza, and those good people of Al Qaeda?
We know for certain that 3,000 dead Americans in one day wasn't enough for him.
The Big Tent Idea May 24, 2008 Grover weaves together a consistent rationale for modeling the current differences between the two major parties in a way that accounts for history, and hopefully also predicts the future. Although he has to stretch the big tent that he draws to include people who agitate on either side of "moral" issues (gay marriage/abortion/etc.), and I personally worry that there will be a reckoning some day with religious right folk who are more of the "Takings" coalition, he puts forth a powerful case for moving the country towards more freedom, less government and a repudiation of the primacy of The State.
A very big step in the direction of exposing the motivations and pathologies of deficit spending, welfare-not-work espousing, radical environmentalism and lawsuit-happy-lawyering left-wing "liberals".
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |