Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming | 
enlarge | Author: Bjorn Lomborg Publisher: Knopf Category: Book
List Price: $21.00 Buy New: $11.62 You Save: $9.38 (45%)
New (40) Used (22) Collectible (2) from $10.95
Avg. Customer Rating: 90 reviews Sales Rank: 4967
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1 Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 272 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 4.9 x 1.2
ISBN: 0307266923 Dewey Decimal Number: 363.73874 EAN: 9780307266927 ASIN: 0307266923
Publication Date: September 4, 2007 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand new Item. CD, DVD, Book, VHS more than 400 000 titles to choose from. ALL days Low Price !
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Amazon.com Guest Reviewer: Michael Crichton In his many science-themed bestsellers--including The Andromeda Strain, Jurassic Park, Prey, and most recently, Next--Michael Crichton has covered everything from genetically engineered dinosaurs to time travel to nantechnology run amok. Having cast his own views on the dangers and hysteria surrounding global warming with State of Fear, he turns his pen toward the often controversial Bjorn Lomborg and his latest book, Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming.
Bjorn Lomborg is the best-informed and most humane advocate for environmental change in the world today. In contrast to other figures that promote a single issue while ignoring others, Lomborg views the globe as a whole, studies all the problems we face, ranks them, and determines how best, and in what order, we should address them. His first book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, established the importance of a fact-based approach. With later books, Global Crises, Global Solutions and How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place, this mild-mannered Danish statistician has steadily gained new converts. Not surprisingly, Time Magazine named him one of the 100 most influential people in the world. Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming will further enhance Lomborg's reputation for global analysis and thoughtful response. For anyone who wants an overview of the global warming debate from an objective source, this brief text is a perfect place to start. Lomborg is only interested in real problems, and he has no patience with media fear-mongering; he begins by dispatching the myth of the endangered polar bears, showing that this Disneyesque cartoon has no relevance to the real world where polar bear populations are in fact increasing. Lomborg considers the issue in detail, citing sources from Al Gore to the World Wildlife Fund, then demonstrating that polar bear populations have actually increased five fold since the 1960s. Lomborg then works his way through the concerns we hear so much about: higher temperatures, heat deaths, species extinctions, the cost of cutting carbon, the technology to do it. Lomborg believes firmly in climate change--despite his critics, he's no denier--but his fact-based approach, grounded in economic analyses, leads him again and again to a different view. He reviews published estimates of the cost of climate change, and the cost of addressing it, and concludes that "we actually end up paying more for a partial solution than the cost of the entire problem. That is a bad deal." In some of the most disturbing chapters, Lomborg recounts what leading climate figures have said about anyone who questions the orthodoxy, thus demonstrating the illiberal, antidemocratic tone of the current debate. Lomborg himself takes the larger view, explaining in detail why the tone of hysteria is inappropriate to addressing the problems we face. In the end, Lomborg's concerns embrace the planet. He contrasts our concern for climate with other concerns such as HIV/AIDS, malnutrition, and providing clean water to the world. In the end, his ability to put climate in a global perspective is perhaps the book's greatest value. Lomborg and Cool It are our best guides to our shared environmental future. --Michael Crichton (photo credit: Jonathan Exley)
Product Description
A groundbreaking book that transforms the debate about global warming by offering a fresh perspective based on human needs as well as environmental concerns.
Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world’s temperature for hundreds of years. Rather than starting with the most radical procedures, Lomborg argues that we should first focus our resources on more immediate concerns, such as fighting malaria and HIV/AIDS and assuring and maintaining a safe, fresh water supply—which can be addressed at a fraction of the cost and save millions of lives within our lifetime. He asks why the debate over climate change has stifled rational dialogue and killed meaningful dissent.
Lomborg presents us with a second generation of thinking on global warming that believes panic is neither warranted nor a constructive place from which to deal with any of humanity’s problems, not just global warming. Cool It promises to be one of the most talked about and influential books of our time.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 85 more reviews...
Convincing But Needs Paleontological Perspective July 23, 2008 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
In COOL IT, Professor Lomborg approaches the global warming controversy by admitting that global warming is real, may in fact be caused in part by recent human activity, but no, global warming is not the End Of Days as predicted by Al Gore. Lomborg takes the hydra-headed Green Peace monolith of global warming and analyzes it in ways that have caused some environmentalists to tag him and others of his ilk as climate deniers, the operative word "deniers" meant to resonate with those who seek to assail true Holocaust deniers. Lomborg suggests that recent attempts to reduce the amount of CO2 in the air as exemplified by the failure of the ratification of the 1997 Kyoto Protocols cannot work as hyped because the cost is too high and the benefit is too low. When I first began to read about Kyoto years ago, I believed the hype that we today are too selfish to reduce our standard of living so that our children and grandchildren can live on a planet with moderate, life-sustaining climate. It was only recently that I learned the United States had good reason to refuse to ratify Kyoto. Lomborg succintly summarizes these reasons as follows: (1) The cost to implement Kyoto would be so staggeringly high that no nation would willingly agree to subsidize the attempt. (2) The benefit would be so miniscule that given the cost of the buck, the "bang" is unacceptable. (3) Lomborg urges society to consider the novel idea that global warming might actually be good for many societies that would benefit from higher temperatures. and (4) there are more efficient ways to alleviate human suffering other than by tossing trillions of dollars down the financial black hole of a global warming that has been appropriated for political agendas by the left. Lomborg's conclusion that we need to focus on R & D as the key is a compelling one. I have a criticism that Lomborg might seek to address in future editions. His entire analysis is relentlessly optimistic only because he considers recent human history vis a vis global warming. What of global warming's very long history of plaguing life on earth over the last few hundred million years? In UNDER A GREEN SKY, Peter Ward considers how global warming has been the catalyst for several mass extinctions, the most severe of which concluded the Permian Period some 230 million years ago. Ward notes that the very oceans turned toxic, pumping noxious fumes into the air until the skies above became tinged with green. If Professor Lomborg were to consider the unhappy lot of the Permian reptiles, his thesis of optimism concerning global warming might then be more palatable. Still, COOL IT is required reading, if for no other reason than to counter the annoying Al Gore and his phony Pultizer.
Cherry Picks Facts, Doesn't Understand the Science July 6, 2008 3 out of 6 found this review helpful
This book seemed reasonable until I started investigating what climate scientists think. For a more informed opinion, see Hell and High Water: Global Warming--the Solution and the Politics--and What We Should Do. Also, read Joseph Romm at ClimateProgress web site and for some real meat go to RealClimate web site. You can look up the actual web site addresses in Google.
Thoughtful Action July 2, 2008 1 out of 3 found this review helpful
The author believes in Man-caused Global Warming. However, rather than reflectively go along with the majority of that group, he demonstrates that their course of action will do little to stem the warming.
He concludes that the better approach is to use the same (or less) amount of money to help people in the developing world. The overall increase in human welfare will then allow the people to adapt to the warmer world.
Excellent Book June 16, 2008 2 out of 6 found this review helpful
This book is very well thought out and documented. I totally enjoyed it...especially the fact that global warming will actually result in a net saving of lives rather than loss.
Also, I enjoyed the practical economic solutions such as not encouraging building near the seashore. Time to stop state and federal government flood (& wind) subsidies for expensive beach homes.
Excellent, insightful book June 13, 2008 3 out of 5 found this review helpful
I enjoyed this book so much I have ordered a number of copies to give friends and family. This guy truly cares about our world. Thankfully he is smart enough to take an honest, measured and very insightful look at the bigger picture of how we can help, rather than relying on misguided rhetoric. He is brave enough to tell the truth that our energies and money should be poured into initiatives that will have a positive effect that almost completely dwarfs the miniscule effect that CO2 focused policies can hope to achieve. I find his writing style eloquent, convincing and easy to read. He layers his arguments in a way that make a great deal of sense. I highly recommend this book.
|
|
|